puzzle-dragon:

avidrumbellerwithaglassheart:

missblackwood:

oate:

*shows up at ur door 10 years after we had an argument* aND ANOTHER THING

lol

image

Tags: ouat ahahaha
geniusorinsanity:

aka-hawkeye:



This is the greatest thing I have ever reblogged.

geniusorinsanity:

aka-hawkeye:

imageimageimage

This is the greatest thing I have ever reblogged.

delintthedarkone:

Leezordly Weezordly color extravaganza

Reblogged from I _PUT_ the fires out

itistimetodisappear:

thedorkiestviking:

ibeggedformercytwice:

ibeggedformercytwice:

ibeggedformercytwice:

My medieval servant boy has gone missing. I’ll just use Google to see if I can find him.

image

Oh bother.

I still say this was hilarious fuck you guys

GODDAMNIT

GET OUT

Reblogged from Untitled

How "That Scene" Might Go This Sunday

  • Zelena: Look, I made us dinner! Isn't this romantic?
  • Rumple: *lightbulb goes off* Why yes, yes it is. In fact, has anyone told you how enchanting you are?
  • Zelena: I am?
  • Rumple: Oh, yes. Your eyes, they're so . . . crazy.
  • Zelena: What?
  • Rumple: Crazy beautiful, that is. And your skin, it's so . . . flammable. I mean, glowing.
  • Zelena: Really?
  • Rumple: *surprise smooch, roots around for dagger*
  • Zelena: Wait a minute-- my boot isn't an erogenous zone! It's like you don't WANT to kiss me!
  • Rumple: Oops?
  • Zelena: *holds dagger* By the power of Greyskull--
  • Rumple: Wrong franchise, dearie.
  • Zelena: I compel you to go back in your cage.
  • Rumple: Curses! Foiled again!

roxymoron101 asked: Art Prompt #would anyone actually be surprised if rumple owned a pair of leather booty shorts #I need a Dark Castle fic where Belle is doing laundry and finds the booty shorts! #I need ART where Rumple is wearing them. Please and thank you

delintthedarkone:

image

Perpetually Shareable Pantaloons! | Storybrooke Version

Reblogged from I _PUT_ the fires out
0ceanofdarkness:

spottytonguedog:

charmedrumbelle:

spottytonguedog:

onceuponatime-confessions:

“Am I missing the obvious here?? Can’t Belle break the Dark One curse with True Love’s kiss??”

Right…but…it’s NEVER broken in Storybrooke. Because magic is not the same there as in FTL.

Here is my thing though …. If magic isn’t the same in SB, and TLK isn’t the same … Then why does the dagger still work?

Because…PLOT HOLES! I really don’t know. They kept going with “magic is different”…I guess because they wanted them to kiss. So I’m really not sure how everything works BUT TLK.

The Blue Fairy told Bae that the Dark One’s curse was specific to their realm, didn’t she? I thought she explicitly stated that it would be neutralized in a land without magic.
Rumple brought magic to SB… but it was magic made from True Love. I’m guessing his curse is too dark to truly be fully present if the only magic to draw on in this world is from such a pure source? Maybe the essence of the curse itself can’t manifest from such magic to truly be present enough to break, but it’s still so much a part of its host the dagger still holds the same control.
There are ways to rationalize the glaring plot holes if you’re creative enough. You could even go so far as to speculate that that’s why Rumple is doing so well controlling himself in SB, that the darker aspects of the curse are somewhat mitigated by the source of magic in this land.

I thought Regina’s curse OVERWROTE everybody else’s curse and made people pure human, which is why Archie was in non-cricket form in Storybrooke and Ruby didn’t transform into a werewolf. When Rumple brought magic back, it meant that people were their base self + magic (i.e., Archie was still human, the Blue Fairy could wield magic but didn’t get her wings back, etc.). Therefore, TLK in Storybrooke wouldn’t work on Rumple because his curse was ‘pre-broken’ by Regina.
However, if that were true Rumple’s dagger shouldn’t compel him because he’d no longer be the Dark One, he’d be a human sorcerer, so I’m not really sure how the Dark One curse works.
Oh dear, we’re back where we started, aren’t we?

0ceanofdarkness:

spottytonguedog:

charmedrumbelle:

spottytonguedog:

onceuponatime-confessions:

Am I missing the obvious here?? Can’t Belle break the Dark One curse with True Love’s kiss??”

Right…but…it’s NEVER broken in Storybrooke. Because magic is not the same there as in FTL.

Here is my thing though …. If magic isn’t the same in SB, and TLK isn’t the same … Then why does the dagger still work?

Because…PLOT HOLES! I really don’t know. They kept going with “magic is different”…I guess because they wanted them to kiss. So I’m really not sure how everything works BUT TLK.

The Blue Fairy told Bae that the Dark One’s curse was specific to their realm, didn’t she? I thought she explicitly stated that it would be neutralized in a land without magic.

Rumple brought magic to SB… but it was magic made from True Love. I’m guessing his curse is too dark to truly be fully present if the only magic to draw on in this world is from such a pure source? Maybe the essence of the curse itself can’t manifest from such magic to truly be present enough to break, but it’s still so much a part of its host the dagger still holds the same control.

There are ways to rationalize the glaring plot holes if you’re creative enough. You could even go so far as to speculate that that’s why Rumple is doing so well controlling himself in SB, that the darker aspects of the curse are somewhat mitigated by the source of magic in this land.

I thought Regina’s curse OVERWROTE everybody else’s curse and made people pure human, which is why Archie was in non-cricket form in Storybrooke and Ruby didn’t transform into a werewolf. When Rumple brought magic back, it meant that people were their base self + magic (i.e., Archie was still human, the Blue Fairy could wield magic but didn’t get her wings back, etc.). Therefore, TLK in Storybrooke wouldn’t work on Rumple because his curse was ‘pre-broken’ by Regina.

However, if that were true Rumple’s dagger shouldn’t compel him because he’d no longer be the Dark One, he’d be a human sorcerer, so I’m not really sure how the Dark One curse works.

Oh dear, we’re back where we started, aren’t we?

Reblogged from Siesiegirl

storybrooke:

Maybe I don’t need answers. Maybe I just need to punch you in the face

Reblogged from Sparkly Dirt

side-by-side-by-scifi:

screwballninja:

"Defiance" isn’t too shabby, but I can’t help but think of Datak Tarr as "Off-brand Rumple."

image

The albino crocodile, though rare in the Enchanted Forest, flourishes in other realms

image

Loving family man, control freak with a peasant past, and shady underworld fixer extraordinaire? I was there first!

He totally is, except his wife is Lacey, not Belle and she’s AWESOME.

image

We could rig the mayoral elections this year, or we could just relax and beat some peasants. Your call, sweetie. 

She’s the bees knees, Lady Macbeth-style!

Reblogged from Side by Side by SciFy

"Defiance" isn’t too shabby, but I can’t help but think of Datak Tarr as "Off-brand Rumple."

The albino crocodile, though rare in the Enchanted Forest, flourishes in other realms

Loving family man, control freak with a peasant past, and shady underworld fixer extraordinaire? I was there first!

Anonymous asked: What's your opinion of confession blogs and anti blogs?

sfiddy:

screwballninja:

I’m down with a ‘ship and let ship’ and ‘hate and let hate’ philosophy, Confessional!Anon! I think trying to tell people how to feel is silly.

That said, the whole pro-character/anti-character dynamic saddens me because they provide an echo chamber of positive feedback: people who love a character only talk to each other or ride into posts to defend their favorite snugglebunnies from ‘haters’, and people who hate a character only talk to each other or ride into posts to try and prove how a character deserves to die, die, die. Either way, people either never see the other side, or get into a shouting match.

A tumblr conversation

And it’s small groups of people that whip themselves into a frenzy, never listen to outside opinions, and encourage each other unquestioningly that can lead to some SERIOUSLY WACKY theories.

Well, that would explain a lot

My favorites include such head-scratchers as:

  • The Charmings took Henry away from Regina because they’re racist
  • Rumple is better than Regina because he usually only kills his relatives and not the peasants
  • Belle should apologize to Hook for saying his heart was rotten
  • And the perennial favorite: Don’t you realize how hard hurting that innocent person was on the VILLAIN?

Exactly!

What I can’t abide is when people accuse other REAL-LIFE PEOPLE of being ‘pro-abuse’ because they like/dislike a FICTIONAL CHARACTER. Don’t do that! Reality is not fiction!

  • If you like Hook, it doesn’t mean the police should search your house for stolen goods
  • If you like Regina, it doesn’t mean CPS should investigate you for child endangerment
  • If you like Rumple, it doesn’t mean the SPCA should investigate you for Human-Crocodile bestiality

Ask me about my cloaca!

But fictional characters are fair game— feel free to hate whatever character you want (and tag it appropriately, natch). I wish there was a neutral space where people could have an honest point/counterpoint debate about characters without flinging terms from the DSM V around, but maybe that’s too much to ask.

DISCLAIMER: All gifs and images found via Google Animated Image search

CLOACA. 

Actually they’re modified keratinized outgrowths with an exaggerated pilomotor reflex assembly.  Sympathetic nervous system activation causes contraction of the assembly, which, in combination with the engorgement of the hemipene, causes increased spacing and outward flaring of the keratin plates.

Why are you looking at me like that.

Aaaand I learned a new thing today. Does ‘hemipene’ mean what I think it does, because .  . . You know what? NEVER MIND. DO NOT THINK THE THING, DO NOT WRITE THE THING, FORGET I EVEN MENTIONED IT.

Reblogged from Sfiddy's stuff